Крајишници из Чикага: Америчку компанију тужимо због душевне боли

0 КОМЕНТАРА

1. Није ово лоше- чисто медијске пажње ради- ал’ нема од тога ништа..:)

   Пријавите се да бисте одговорили

2. Kalabalak, 07.12.2012. 13:04:17
   Ma,ovo je neka zajebancija.Besposlen pop i jarice krsti,trla baba lan da joj prodje dan.Jos jedan pokusaj bogacenja i profiterstva na racun zrtava(Srpska posla).Poslije sjednice tog tzv.sabora,svi ce na nostalgocni koncert Harisa Dzinovica.
   Bolje bi bilo da skupe neki dinar,osnuju kakvu kompaniju i zaposle kojeg izbjeglicu ili bilo sta drugo.Cuj tuzice neku registrovanu firmu penzionera koji mlate pare ko vise plati.
   Pa sto nijesu oni platili istu firmu da ucestvuje u odbrani?
   Bolje bi bilo da se malo ugledaju na ustasko-fasisticku emigraciju koja je odigrala presudnu ulogu u dogadjajima u Hrvatskoj i ako cemo pravo,ti nacisti(koliko god ih mi ne voljeli) su se makar organizovali kako treba i pokazali da im je stalo do zavicaja.
   A ne kao nase prodate duse…

   Пријавите се да бисте одговорили

3. Види, што је најгоре- постоји правна основа:

   http://www.ejil.org/pdfs/19/5/1695.pdf

   („Individual Liability of Private Military Personnel under International Criminal Law“, by Chia Lehnardt – The European Journal of International Law Vol. 19 no. 5)

   Даје конкретан примјер „Олује“ :

   „Apart from committing a crime as an individual by fulfi lling the requirements of an
   international crime in his own person, 40 a PMC employee may also become criminally
   liable jointly with others, as an accomplice, or under the principle of superior responsibility.
   When considering these various modes of participation, the role of MPRI in the
   Croatian military ‘ Operation Storm ’ in 1995 against Serb forces may serve as an illustration.
   The Croatian army drove 100,000 Serbs from Croatia, regained territory that
   had been held by Serb rebels for four years, and in the process targeted mostly civilians.
   In terms of numbers, it was the largest single ‘ ethnic cleansing ’ of the war. MPRI
   maintains that its involvement was limited to the provision of human rights training.
   Several commentators believe that there was evidence that someone referred to as
   ‘ the American general ’ , assumed to be one of the retired American generals on MPRI’s
   payroll, had planned the operation. In the end, the precise form of MPRI’s contribution
   remains uncertain. 41 Depending on the factual circumstances it is possible that
   MPRI personnel were responsible for committing the crimes jointly with the Croatian
   army, for encouraging or ordering the crimes, for aiding and abetting it, or under the
   principle of superior command responsibility.

   If there was a common plan, design, or purpose formed with MPRI personnel on the
   basis of which the Croatian army conducted Operation Storm it is irrelevant whether
   MPRI employees were, in fact, present at the site or participated in the execution of the
   common plan; 42 nor is it relevant that MPRI personnel and Croatian troops were not part of the same unit. 43 In either case they would be individually responsible. Rather, a
   signifi cant and causal contribution to the accomplishment of the crime is crucial; this
   can consist of any kind of assistance, such as contributions at the planning stage. 44
   Even if the Croatian army had committed excesses during Operation Storm which
   went beyond the framework of the common plan created by MPRI and the Croatian
   army, MPRI employees would be criminally responsible if these excesses had been the
   ‘ natural and foreseeable consequence ’ of the plan’s execution. 45
   If the crimes are not executed according to a common plan, but private military
   personnel still contribute to their commission, they may become criminally responsible
   under international law for encouraging the commission of or aiding and abetting
   an international crime.“

   АЛИ- као што и мала дјеца знају- правда је увијек на страни Америке.. B-)

   Пријавите се да бисте одговорили

4. Pa sve je jasno iz samog teksta.
   Fakticki ako je ko odgovoran u ovom slucaju ona je moguce samo i iskljucivo pokretanje individualne odgovornosti.
   Ali nevezano za to.Mislim da sva prica jednostavno pada u vodu kad se uzme u obzir afera Black Water recimo.Niko nije odgovarao.Zasto?
   Pa postoje ugovori koji stite cak i pojedince.Mozda ce tu i tamo nekog i optuziti na osnovu te individualne odgovornosti vise na bazi “Insubordinations“ ,“misconduction“ ili “inappropriate bahaviour“…drugim rijecima,kaznice ali ne zato sto su ucinili to sto su ucinili nego zato sto su postupili recimo na svoju ruku.
   Kad se na sve doda (opet iz samog teksta)
   “The Croatian army drove 100,000 Serbs from Croatia, regained territory that
   had been held by Serb rebels for four years“
   Imamo “regularnu vojsku“ i neke tamo “pobunjenike“,pa onda imamo izjave zvanicnika(cudna mi cuda)da se radi o legitimnoj operaciji i kao krunu sada ovo oslobadjanje zlocinaca,sta onda traziti??…
   Ovo je isto kao kad bi neko Hitlera optuzio za neki nestasluk ,kradju u nekoj Jevrajskoj prodavnici i oko toga vodio cijelu polemiku,ispustajuci u isto vrijeme glavnu stvar a to je planirani genocid…
   Gubljenje vremena.

   Пријавите се да бисте одговорили

5. A to sto kazes,pravda je na na strani amerike ima i svoju podlogu.
   Naime,njihova diplomatija radi punom parom da se nelogicne rezolucije prihvate na medjunarodnom nivou a administracija takodje radi punom parom da bilo ko za svaki eventualni korak ima administrativno pokrice.

   Jedini nacin borbe je jednostavno odbaciti aktuelne mehanizme medjunarodnih odnosa ali to opet onda vodi u krsenje medjunarodnog a onda posljedicno u tzv.“ljudskih prava,koja su vezali za to medjunarodno.

   http://vukajlija.com/zabava/posteri/554073

   Пријавите се да бисте одговорили